![intel iris graphics 6100 vs intel iris pro intel iris graphics 6100 vs intel iris pro](https://www.purepc.pl/image/artykul/2020/10/31_intel_iris_xe_graphics_vs_amd_radeon_graphics_test_ukladow_igpu_47_b.jpg)
- Intel iris graphics 6100 vs intel iris pro 1080p#
- Intel iris graphics 6100 vs intel iris pro drivers#
- Intel iris graphics 6100 vs intel iris pro software#
Intel iris graphics 6100 vs intel iris pro software#
Software and workloads used in performance tests might be optimized for performance only on Intel® microprocessors. World of Warcraft: Mists of Pandaria PRC*ġ Titles require you to manually lower some of the game settings.World of Warcraft: Warlords of Draenor*.The Incredible Adventures of Van Helsing II*.Ship Simulator: Maritime Search and Rescue* 1.Sherlock Holmes: Crimes and Punishments*.MXGP - The Official Motocross Videogame*.Magic 2014: The Gathering - Duels of the Planeswalkers*.Helicopter Simulator 2014: Search and Rescue*.Company of Heroes 2: Western Front Armies* 1.Performance was really good, which isn't too surprising considering the use of a $400 external GPU enclosure with a $400 GPU, connected to a NUC that will likely retail for $600 or more. Intel had Razer's Core on hand, hooked up to Skull Canyon and running a high-end GPU, running Just Cause 3 but at high quality settings. As a compact PC capable of handling just about any task you might want to run, Skull Canyon is pretty sweet. In addition to the i7-6770HQ, Skull Canyon has a Thunderbolt 3 port, two M.2 SSD slots, and two SO-DIMM slots capable of running up to 32GB of DDR4 memory. Perhaps more interesting are the remaining specs of the Skull Canyon NUC. They're by no means perfect, but they've gotten a lot better-by taking six generations of baby steps.
Intel iris graphics 6100 vs intel iris pro drivers#
It's not just about performance either Intel's graphics drivers have come a long way since 2011, and these days they support DX12 and generally don't have massive rendering errors, even on the latest games.
Intel iris graphics 6100 vs intel iris pro 1080p#
For games that aren't on the cutting edge, the new Iris Pro should be able to hit 1080p with good settings.
![intel iris graphics 6100 vs intel iris pro intel iris graphics 6100 vs intel iris pro](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Do8wEjQpor8/maxresdefault.jpg)
The problem is that the graphics settings were turned way down, so it was a bit like looking at a game running on Xbox 360. One of the units let us play Just Cause 3, at 1080p, and performance was actually quite decent. While we couldn't benchmark the solution yet, Intel was showing off their new Skull Canyon NUC, running with the i7-6770HQ. The Skull Canyon NUC measures around 8 x 4 x 1 inches
![intel iris graphics 6100 vs intel iris pro intel iris graphics 6100 vs intel iris pro](https://www.hd-tecnologia.com/imagenes/articulos/2015/06/Te-mostramos-como-rinden-las-nuevas-Iris-Pro-6200-de-Intel-2-600x311.png)
But forget about being 50 times faster than an ancient graphics solution what does it all mean in today's world? Intel is also talking specifically about the performance of the i5-520UM compared to the new i7-6770HQ, which means they're comparing an old 15W part with a new 45W processor. Combined with architectural improvements, the newcomer potentially doubles the performance of the previous generation of Intel Graphics, and Intel is quoting a 50X performance improvement since their first generation HD Graphics from five years back.Ī fifty-fold boost to graphics performance sounds pretty incredible, but what does that mean if we're talking Nvidia and AMD equivalents? Well, it's certainly not going to be at the same level of performance as the GTX 970 or R9 290, which are the minimum spec GPUs for Oculus Rift. Skylake's Iris Pro Graphics packs 72 execution units (EUs), up from a maximum of 48 in Broadwell. Does that all change with Skylake and Iris Pro Graphics? No, but we do see yet another rather substantial increase in processor graphics performance.